Piktogramm eines Zuges

NRFK9 conference in Copenhagen + MoH conference in Lund

RHET AI mem­bers have two con­fer­ences com­ing up at the begin­ning of Octo­ber, one in Copen­ha­gen, Den­mark and one in Lund, Sweden. At the Rhet­or­ic in Digit­al and Tech­no­lo­gic­al Trans­ition con­fer­ence in Copen­ha­gen, Markus Gott­schling and Salina Weber from the RHET AI Cen­ter will give a talk titled Towards Rhet­or­ic­al AI Lit­er­acy. Markus Gott­schling will then attend The Mak­ing of Human­it­ies con­fer­ence in Lund to present a pan­el on 'Jagged lines of exper­i­ence' as Sites of Epi­stem­ic Pro­ductiv­ity in the Human­it­ies togeth­er with Fabi­an Erhardt (RHET AI) and Sara Bangert (Uni­ver­sity of Tübingen).

NKRF9: Rhet­or­ic in Digit­al and Tech­no­lo­gic­al Trans­ition (Uni­ver­sity of Copenhagen)

The mul­ti­me­dia online world and com­mu­nic­a­tion: In today's world, rhet­or­ic is tak­ing on a new form due to rap­id digit­al and tech­no­lo­gic­al devel­op­ments, entail­ing new chal­lenges and reg­u­la­tions. From teach­ing to research to prac­tic­al advice: Everything revolves around algorithms and AI, which are chan­ging the way we com­mu­nic­ate with each oth­er. How­ever, rhet­or­ic also thrives on ana­log com­mu­nic­a­tion, for which places, mater­i­als and actu­al phys­ic­al pres­ence is cent­ral. How can the ana­log, clas­sic­al side of rhet­or­ic and the ongo­ing digit­al devel­op­ments be recon­ciled? What new pos­sib­il­it­ies are open­ing up, how should and must the field of rhet­or­ic con­tin­ue to devel­op and what new research ques­tions does this raise?

In their talk Towards Rhet­or­ic­al AI Lit­er­acy, Markus Gott­schling and Salina Weber dis­cuss the unstop­pable rise of gen­er­at­ive AI, mak­ing it increas­ingly import­ant to acquire AI skills — espe­cially for research­ers, admin­is­trat­ors and com­mu­nic­at­ors in aca­demia. Since gen­er­at­ive AI only imit­ates exist­ing texts or images and pro­duces "bull­shit" in the sense of Harry G. Frank­furt, its use in com­mu­nic­a­tion can have both pos­it­ive and neg­at­ive effects. Through work­shops, the RHET AI Cen­ter aims to impart rhet­or­ic­al AI com­pet­ences that go bey­ond tech­nic­al under­stand­ing and will improve the applic­a­tion of AI in com­mu­nic­a­tion through clas­sic­al rhet­or­ic­al con­cepts such as doxa, topoi and imitatio.

Also speak­ing at the con­fer­ence: Sine N. Just, Pro­fess­or at the Depart­ment of Com­mu­nic­a­tion and Human­it­ies (Roskilde Uni­ver­sity, Den­mark), Dami­en Pfister, Asso­ci­ate Pro­fess­or, Depart­ment of Clas­sics (Uni­ver­sity of Mary­land, USA) and Johanna Har­teli­us, Asso­ci­ate Pro­fess­or, Chair of Com­mu­nic­a­tion Stud­ies (Moody Col­lege of Com­mu­nic­a­tion, Uni­ver­sity of Texas at Aus­tin, USA).

Sine N. Just argues that digit­al tech­no­lo­gies are increas­ing polar­iz­a­tion through per­son­al­iz­a­tion and algorithms. She dia­gnoses the cur­rent situ­ation as a "clos­ing of the rhet­or­ic­al mind" and sug­gests reviv­ing clas­sic rhet­or­ic­al prac­tices such as con­tro­ver­sia to pro­mote pub­lic debate and trust.

In his key­note, Dami­en Pfister dis­cusses the digit­al trans­form­a­tion that rhet­or­ic is under­go­ing and the res­ult­ing new the­or­ies that are pro­du­cing new tech­no­lo­gic­al and eco­lo­gic­al con­cepts. These con­cepts exam­ine how digit­al tech­no­lo­gies and non-human act­ors influ­ence our coexistence.

Johanna Har­teli­us emphas­izes that algorithmic think­ing and AI have been in the pub­lic eye since the end of 2022. In her key­note, she exam­ines how lay­man dis­courses inter­pret their “learn­ing pro­cesses” through tools such as Mid­jour­ney and what impact this has on the concept of eth­os and coex­ist­ence with AI.

Markus Gott­schling and Salina Weber at the NKRF9 con­fer­ence in Copenhagen.

The Mak­ing of the Human­it­ies (MoH) XI, Lund 2024 (Soci­ety for the His­tory of the Humanities)

The MoH con­fer­ences bring togeth­er aca­dem­ics and his­tor­i­ans inter­ested in the devel­op­ment of his­tory in dis­cip­lines such as archae­ology, art his­tory, his­tori­ography, lin­guist­ics, lit­er­ary stud­ies, media stud­ies, musi­co­logy and philo­logy. The over­arch­ing theme of this year is Shift­ing Cul­tures of Know­ledge in the His­tory of the Human­it­ies.

The focus is on the ques­tion of wheth­er it is time to rethink the his­tory of the human­it­ies in rela­tion to oth­er epi­stem­ic formats. Dur­ing the three-day con­fer­ence there will be two key­notes and sev­er­al panels.

Pan­el top­ics include, for example, Com­plex­ity (Sci­ence) and the (His­tory of) Human­it­ies, Pur­pose of His­tory and Prac­tices of Writ­ing in the 19th Cen­tury, and The Social Dia­spora of Human­ist­ic Know­ledge.

The pan­el 'Jagged lines of exper­i­ence' as Sites of Epi­stem­ic Pro­ductiv­ity in the Human­it­ies by Fabi­an Erhardt, Sara Bangert and Markus Gott­schling deals with the concept of "Jagged lines of exper­i­ence" accord­ing to Bernhard Walden­fels, which refers to cracks and uncer­tain­ties in exper­i­ence that break through estab­lished orders. In their lec­tures, the three will exam­ine this top­ic using cases such as the sub­lime in Kant, epi­stem­ic encoun­ters with "the sig­ni­fic­ant oth­er­ness" by Donna Har­away and fic­tion­al­iz­a­tion in sci­ence com­mu­nic­a­tion to illus­trate the meth­od­o­lo­gic­al and the­or­et­ic­al approaches of the human­it­ies in deal­ing with such experiences.

We are very excited about both con­fer­ences and are look­ing for­ward to the reports­from our colleagues!